This week I am running a special five-part podcasts, which considers the evolving landscape around risk, compliance and ethics. In this podcast series, I will visit with Paul Johns, Chief Marketing Officer, and Rebecca Turco, Vice President of Learning, both from SAI Global Pty Limited, the sponsor of this podcast series. Today, I wanted to discuss some of Turco’s observations on the trends in ethics and compliance learning.

The first is adaptive learning, which is more of a personalization way to learn. Turco believes it is key for the compliance ethics discipline because it “really looks at how do we differentiate the content for the learners.” Moreover, adaptive learning is designed to focus on “making sure the learners are getting the content and relevant information that they need within any piece of content. It begins with asking questions about where they work and whether they interact with government officials. From there, it moves to serve up content to the employee which is meaningful, that helps them start to see what risks are in their area. It also allows content designers to be able to give them a personalization to the training experience that is more meaningful than just kind of a one size fits all.”

This trend is useful as it does not reinvent training for employees who do not need it. This comes from “giving people credit for understanding risks, giving them the ability to kind of test out, by asking them a series of questions and if they know the answers, they may know what their risks are and they can move to a level at which they do not know the answers. You do not need to train employees in areas where they have demonstrated competency. This gives companies the opportunities to really think about their program and differentiate the ethics and compliance training of their compliance program.” Turco concluded, “in the world today, people are looking for compliance training that is as short and sweet as possible, getting to the relevant pieces of information.”

Another trend is the concept of branching, which is building out different training scenarios. Turco provided an example of training about “a security breach. Things happen on a video and the learner is watching them unfold. By using adaptive technology you can require the learner to pick out the hotspot where they would see a risk or something being violated. From there the video would branch off into different scenarios based on what you decide because that’s real life. It is not the first decision that causes an ethical breach or a security breach. It’s for decisions down the road. That’s the hard part in training to get right because it is not always just as black and white as is the conflict of interest might lie.”

An important trend in ethics and compliance learning is the effectiveness of compliance training. Interestingly, Turco said the first question asked is about the content of the training, not the data around this issue. She explained, “you can collect as much data as you want for any, any reason but if the content you are writing and designing for the training is not meaningful, then the data you’re getting isn’t meaningful.” (as fine a definition of GIGO as I have ever heard.)  She said that a company must really think about data and how to use it to make your program smarter and to make you understand where the risks are in your organization.

Effectiveness then starts with building content with thought provoking questions in the presentation. This leads to scenarios which ask the learner, “what do you think?” From there you can begin collecting the data from their responses and start to analyze it on the back end. This can give you trends about whether there is a disconnect in your written Code of Conduct, policies and procedures and how business is operationalized in the field.  With this data, an organization can start to target campaigns to that team around that risk area identified. Turco pointed to one example where a company was able to demonstrate through this approach a training competency and effectiveness increase from 20% to 80% in one year.

Your goal should be that the needle is moving and your organization is providing employees the tools in order to make sure they have the knowledge and the competency to not only pass that assessment but also understand those risks in the business. This is far beyond the “check the box” method of training. With the speed of current day corporate decision making in the field and the pressure your sales teams are under to meet goals, timelines and deadlines; you need to provide training to meet these business realities. Once you understand that, then you can start to understand how to provide your employees effective training.

Turco concluded by noting that your training should aid in the decision-making process when the teams are under pressure; whether that be sales pressure, pressure due to a high-risk region or other. Turco said, “How do you make sure that when they’re under that pressure, they will know exactly what to do?” The data collected from the training process can help identify risks, provide the opportunity to help employees understand more and drive training or campaigning around risks.

This publication contains general information only and is based on the experiences and research of the author. The author is not, by means of this publication, rendering business, legal advice, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such legal advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified legal advisor. The author, his affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person or entity that relies on this publication. The Author gives his permission to link, post, distribute, or reference this article for any lawful purpose, provided attribution is made to the author. The author can be reached at

© Thomas R. Fox, 2018